Thursday, January 23, 2014

Come and See

John 1:29-42
January 19, 2014
The gospel of John begins, famously, with the wordy, philosophical, decidedly Greek prologue: “In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God.” But before you can even begin to digest what this reference to the divine logos might possibly mean, John jumps straight into the story of the Baptist and his voice crying out in the wilderness, “prepare the way!”
No sooner does John cry out, than he starts pointing out: “look, there! It’s Jesus, the lamb of God.”
And that’s apparently all it took, the only testimony necessary, for immediately two disciples start to follow Jesus, even though it’s readily apparent from their questions that they don’t know where Jesus is heading.
All he says is: “come and see.”
Those words, and this passage, have a deep resonance for me, and a special place in my own story. This text from John was preached the morning, about 20 years ago, when Cheryl and I decided to attend a “perspective new members” gathering at a Presbyterian church in Lexington, Ky.
I grew up in the Presbyterian church – an oddity among Presbyterian clergy my age or younger. And I ran hard from it as a young adult – a very common path among young adults raised in Mainline Protestant denominations during the past 50 years. Despite the fact that beginning when I was in high school I felt drawn to ministry, and despite the fact that before I was 25 I had a masters degree from the University of Chicago Divinity School, by the time I was 25 I had “come and seen” and “turned and fled.”
Yet there we were, a decade later, sitting in the pews, listening to this strange little story: “come and see, come and see.”
You see, there’s something about Jesus and his call that is just hard to ignore, and that changes the script you imagine for your life.
You know the script. We all know it. We are, all of us, socialized into it from the moment of our birth. Old Testament scholar Walter Brueggemann calls the social script of our society “technological, therapeutic, consumer militarism.”[1] Marcus Borg names the fundamental values – he calls them idols – of this script: achievement, appearance and affluence.[2] Walter Wink speaks of the powers that be within what he calls a system of domination.[3] Other theologians offer other, but fundamentally similar, descriptions of contemporary social norms and expectations, and the power of their allure – or, perhaps, the allure of their power.
I lived out the script working in the state government arena, with a modicum of achievement and a modicum of affluence, and, well, I looked good doing it! But something was missing – something of wholeness, mutual well-being, authentic community, something of communion.
Brueggemann, in describing the dominate script of our culture, argues that the script fails in its fundamental promises because it ultimately does not deliver either security or happiness. I tend to agree in terms of security – the vast majority of us live paycheck to paycheck often one serious illness or job loss from bankruptcy, and all of us live in a society so filled with guns that going to the movies or to a burger joint might turn out to be a fatal decision.
The one piece of Brueggemann's description that I would question is his notion that "we may be the unhappiest society in the world." By most measures of well being (including self-reported "life satisfaction" questions) North Americans are not particularly "unhappy." It’s not that we’re unhappy, but rather that we’re blissful – and blissfully unaware of how much the material sources of our happiness rest upon massive injustice, inequality, and violence.
In other words, if I want folks to question the dominant script, saying "you're not happy" is a nonstarter because most folks who walk through our doors (and most of the ones who don't walk through our doors, but walk in and out of the shops and businesses nearby) may feel stressed and stretched and often hungry for deeper meaning, but we don't usually describe ourselves as "unhappy."
The dominant script does "work" for some of us, but it does so on the backs of many more. Almost all of us Mainline Protestants in North America are part, globally speaking, of the one percent. We wrote the script. We benefit from it. It makes many of us happy. And it is massively unjust and unsustainable because it depends upon environmental destruction, abusive labor conditions, child labor, and a huge and growing gap between rich and poor. It depends, ultimately, on dividing the world into “us” and “them,” and building militarized walls to sustain the division.
When Jesus says, “come and see,” he is inviting the disciples into a community that insists upon the recognition of a fundamental relationship: we are all children of the same God; we are all the beloved; there is no “us” and “them.”
The cultural script in Jesus’ time insisted upon the primacy of tribe, of kinship ties, of blood relationship. When Jesus poured the cup and said, “this cup is the new covenant in my blood,” he inaugurated an entirely new script: you are not bound by the blood of kinship but by the love that courses through my veins for everyone.
Jesus invites us into a story marked by particular blessings: not mere happiness, but rather blessedness; not the kingdom of wealth but, instead, the commonwealth of the beloved; not the false security of weapons of war, but, in their place, the invitation to be called the children of God.
In The Cost of Discipleship, Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s monumental reflection on the Sermon on the Mount, he observes that “we could understand and interpret the Sermon on the Mount in a thousand different ways. Jesus knows only one possibility: simple surrender and obedience, not interpreting it or applying it, but doing and obeying it. … But again he does not mean that it is to be discussed as an ideal, he really means us to get on with it.”[4]
·         Be salt and light for the world.
·         Let your “yes” be “yes” and your “no” be “no.”
·         Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.
·         Serve God rather than wealth because you cannot serve both.
Interpreting all that, and so much more, is so much easier than living it. The alternative script of the gospel is not easy, the way Jesus invites us to walk with him is narrow.
But knock and the door will be opened to you, seek and you shall find.
This is the alternative story, the counter narrative, the other path of the gospel entrusted to the church. When Jesus says, “come and see,” he is inviting us to travel this path and to share this story with a world that needs it even more desperately today than it did 2,000 years ago.
The alternative story that the church offers to the world does not promise that following Jesus will make you happier or healthier or safer or richer. Instead, in this story we we are invited into a relationship that binds us all – all of us – to one another. In this story we are bound together, and in that binding we find wholeness, mutual well-being, authentic community, deep communion. In other words, when Jesus says, “come and see,” he is inviting us to experience salvation.
Come and see. Amen.



[2] Marcus Borg, The Heart of Christianity (my copy of which has been loaned out, so no details!)
[3] See Wink’s massive trilogy on The Powers.
[4] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship (New York: Touchstone, 1995 edition) 196-7.