Sunday, January 14, 2018

According to Your Purpose

December 24, 2017
Luke 1:26-28
As Mary and Joseph made their way to Bethlehem did their donkey have a bumper sticker reading #MeToo slapped on its hind quarters? Was Mary just another in a seemingly endless line of women sexually victimized by a more powerful male? Was the beginning of the Incarnation story just another chapter in the endless history of patriarchy?
Or, perhaps, is something else going on here at the beginning of the Jesus story? Is the beginning of Jesus the beginning of something entirely new?
Let’s stipulate several things up front:
First, it’s Christmas Eve morning and most of us don’t want to spend overly much time in Biblical exegesis just now!
Second, there’s 2,000 years of such interpretive work out there already so, seriously, we could be here all day … and, honestly, til next Christmas and read about nothing else, and still not exhaust the supply theologies of Mary, or Mariology, as it’s known in academic circles.
Third, most of that Mariology has been shaped by the deep-seated patriarchy – if not outright misogyny – of the Roman Catholic Church. That orthodox Catholic Mariology gives rise to traditional understandings of Mary as eternally virgin, and the church as the sinless bride of Christ. To be fair, there’s a lot more than that going on even in traditional readings, but, as we’ve noted, it’s Christmas Eve morning and we’re just not going to drag ourselves through all of that.
That history is there and it has certainly had profound influence on Christian thought and expression straight on through to our time. But, honestly, it doesn’t have a great deal to offer us just now. We know that the church is far from the sinless bride of Christ, and we also know a whole lot a basic biology that neither Luke nor centuries of theologians understood.
So, let’s stipulate a couple of things that orthodoxy would not necessarily easily agree to:
The story of the annunciation and that of the incarnation are not concerned with Mary’s sex life; they are about Mary’s faith life and about God’s purposes in the world.
I’m not interested in Mary’s sex life, to be frank. I cannot learn anything about it that will, in any way, change the way I try to live in the world. The witness of her faith, on the other hand, challenges me and compels me to try to live my own faith more deeply.
As Rosemary Radford Ruether put it in her seminal work, Sexism and God-Talk, “Luke goes out of his way to stress that Mary’s motherhood is a free choice. When the angel arrives, Mary does not consult Joseph, but makes her own decision. Luke sees this free choice as an expression of her faith. This is the key to the new redemptive community of Jesus, as distinct from the old kind of family relationships.”[1]
The power of the gospel begins right there in the reordering of domestic life. Jesus makes this break clear in various places throughout the gospels. As Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza notes in her classic, In Memory of Her, “Jesus brings to the patriarchal household not peace but rather the ‘sword,’ the symbol for bitter enmity between members of the same household.”[2] Fiorenza goes on to insist, “Without question the discipleship of Jesus does not respect patriarchal family bonds, and the Jesus movement in Palestine severely intrudes into the peace of the patriarchal household.”[3]
The impulse to reorder every other sphere of life ripples out from this foundational reordering of the domestic sphere.
As Ruether goes on to say, “According to Luke, God enters history in the person of Christ to effect a liberating revolution in human relationships.”[4]
In particular, for the Jesus movement in first-century Palestine, this revolution turned the world around for women. As Fiorenza puts it, “Faithful discipleship, not biological motherhood, is the eschatological calling of women.”[5]
Perhaps it goes without saying that faithful discipleship is also the eschatological calling of men, but let’s say it anyway. Because saying it anyway – insisting that faithful discipleship is the singular purpose of human life – puts the focus in the story of the Annunciation where it should be: not on Mary’s sex life, but on her faithful response to the movement of the Holy Spirit in her whole life. It puts the focus, in fact, on a single phrase that points out toward the whole of life: “let it be with me according to your word.”
Mary speaks this line to the angel Gabriel, the messenger who has told her that God is calling her to bear God into the world. Basically, she responds, “OK, let what you’ve said be so.”
But beneath this response to the messenger lies this further response to God, “let it be with me God according to your purpose.” That is to say, in saying “yes” to the messenger and the message, she is also saying “yes” to God’s intentions that rest behind it.
She is saying “yes” to the hard work of working out God’s purposes for her life, and saying “yes” to following them throughout her life. She is saying “yes” to the hard work of working out God’s purposes for the whole world, and saying “yes” to participating in those purposes as she is able.
Our reading this morning ends there – with Mary’s “yes” – but we also know what Mary does next. She does what women have done countless times before her and since: she talks with another woman. She seeks comfort, consolation, solidarity in the company of another woman. Mary goes to see her relative, Elizabeth.
Elizabeth is well into her own pregnancy with the child who will grow up, according to Luke, to become John the Baptist. Elizabeth proclaims Mary’s blessedness, and that of Mary’s unborn child. And Mary responds lyrically:
“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.”
Up to this point in Luke’s gospel it’s all cards and carols. Hallmark could have written pretty much all of the story – right up until it becomes a musical. For when Mary starts to sing she reveals her own deep understanding of the purposes of God in this mysterious pregnancy. Mary reveals her grasp of the dynamics at play. If her pregnancy signals a reordering of patriarchal domestic life, it will necessarily ripple out to the broader social sphere. The world is about to turn.
Echoing the song of her foresister, Hannah, Mary proclaims that through the life of the child she is bearing into the world God will bring the powerful down from their thrones and lift up the lowly; God will fill the hungry with good things to eat, and send the rich away empty. God is turning the world around, and that turning, begun with Mary’s faithfulness, has a momentum that belongs to God.
Hallmark gave up its rights to the story right about there, for, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer put it, “For the mighty ones, for the great ones of this world, there are only two places where their courage deserts them, which they fear in the depths of their souls, which they dodge and avoid: the manger and the cross of Jesus Christ.”
That is precisely where we are invited again this Advent season: to follow the courage and faithfulness of a young woman who said simply, “let it be with me, God, according to your purpose.” Do we dare to come to the manger? Do we dare to approach? Do we dare to say, “let it be with us, Holy One, according to your purpose”? Amen.



[1] Rosemary Radford Ruether, Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology (Boston: Beacon Press, 1983) 153-4.
[2] Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza, In Memory of Her (New York: Crossroad, 1983) 146.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ruether, 155.
[5] Fiorenza, 146.