Wednesday, June 03, 2015

Why Are We Here?

Isaiah 6:1-8; John 3:1-10

May 31, 2015
Over the past 25 years or so, I have turned often for insight, inspiration, and agitation to a collection of Wendell Berry’s essays entitled, What Are People For? Unlike the Westminster Divines, Berry never attempts a direct answer to the question. Our 17th-century forebears from England phrased the question this way: “what is the chief end of man?” Their answer? “To glorify God and enjoy God forever.”
I posed the question my own way – “why are we here?” – because I am so often at a loss when I go wandering and find myself some place most unexpected. Moreover, I think place is important when you’re trying to sort our what people are for, or what the chief end of humankind amounts to.
That is to say, people on a baseball field may have a different end or purpose than people in a protest march or people at camp or people in a classroom. Context matters.
At least, context matters when we try to live out our purpose in the world. Even if we take the Westminster Catechism as our guide, the way we glorify and enjoy God in a hospital room is probably different than the way we glorify and enjoy God in a boardroom.
What Berry reminds me, though, is that while context matters greatly in sorting what I am here for, in a larger sense, I am wherever I am to experience the grace of engaging the world, the gift that opens upon engaging creation and community.
In an extended prose poem that is the first section of What Are People For?, Berry writes these lines:
Good work finds the way between pride and despair.
It graces with health. It heals with grace.
It preserves the given so that it remains a gift.
By it, we lose loneliness:
We clasp the hands of those who go before us, and the hands of those who come after us;
We enter the little circle of each other’s arms,
And the larger circle of lovers whose hands are joined in a dance,
And the larger circle of all creatures, passing in and out of life, who move also in a dance, to a music so subtle and vast that no ear hears it except in fragments.[1]
Listening for the fragments of the vast symphony is key to discerning our vocation, our calling, our own individual responses – in our given time and place and situation – to the question Berry poses: what are we for?
It’s the question Isaiah begins to sort out as he imagines the great dance of the seraphs in the midst of their song: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the earth is full of God’s glory.” Isaiah hears a fragment of the great symphony, and in its strains he discerns the voice of God asking, “whom shall I send?”
Berry might answer his own question – what are people for – by simply saying, “to do good work,” and one could be forgiven for jumping to the conclusion that this is some kind of “works righteousness” unless one recalls that, elsewhere, Berry also writes that “good work, done kindly and well, is prayer.”
God, after all, presumably sends Isaiah out into the world to do something, to engage the world – in other words, to do good work, work that heals, work that makes the world more whole, work that builds up the commonwealth, work, that is to say, that saves or, that at the very least, participates in God’s unfolding work of salvation.
Which brings us to the reading from John’s gospel. If we’re paying any attention at all, we recognize the incredible richness and challenge of this particular passage and, what’s more, we know what’s coming next.
God’s unfolding work of salvation, John’s gospel insists, involves being born again from above.
At some point or another in many of our lives we have either been personally confronted by the question – “are you born again?” – or we’ve witnessed people wielding the question like a cudgel on someone else. It’s become such a trope of the conservative evangelical world that it’s difficult to hear in it any fragment of the great symphony Isaiah heard.
But let’s see if we can look at this story afresh. After all, it’s a story. Let’s pose some questions to the story. A guy – a faithful religious leader, the story tells us – comes to see Jesus at night.
Why at night?
Why come at all? That is to say, what do you suppose Nicodemus wants to learn?
What would you want to learn from Jesus?
The story, of course, doesn’t answer these questions, but John’s gospel does offer us another glimpse of Nicodemus much later, for Nicodemus brings a hundred pounds of burial spices to wrap Jesus’ body in after the crucifixion. I can’t help thinking that something profound happened that first night when Nicodemus met Jesus.
Jesus touched his life such that Nicodemus made a risky and extravagant offering. The gospel is silent on it, but I believe Nicodemus loved Jesus and his life was transformed by love.
That’s what love does. Love changes lives.
The great pattern of scripture, underscored in the texts we’ve just read and repeated with remarkable frequency, is as simple as it is clear: love compels transformative action. Put even more simply, in scripture, the faithful are sent into the world to love the world.
The words describe the pattern, and it’s clear in the most famous words of all Christian scripture – indeed, the words that John writes as the conclusion to this night story of Nicodemus: for God so loved the world that God sent Jesus into the world in order to transform it, to make it whole and healthy, in other words, to save it.
Now this sounds all sweet and light and nice. God loves the world. Jesus saves the world. Neat and tidy, seal it with a bow. But we don’t have to look very far to understand that there’s more to it. Indeed, most of the time, for me, anyway, I don’t really need to look beyond the mirror to know that my own salvation is incomplete. I can look around my own neighborhood to understand clearly that the salvation of my own community is incomplete, and a cursory look at the news tells me that the salvation of the world is far from accomplished.
That’s the truth that Nicodemus confronts in the midnight hour – in order to live into wholeness, healing, community – that is to say, in order to live into salvation – one must be born again … and again … and again. Confronted with this phrase that has far too often been used to beat folks over the head, we have two choices: ignore the phrase and be done with it altogether; or, wrestle with it.
To ignore it concedes the field of Biblical interpretation to those who want to beat folks up with it, so I choose to wrestle, and I’ll make it a tag team effort by calling again on Berry.
Though he doesn’t make this claim explicitly, I think it’s a perfectly fair reading of the third chapter of John and of What Are People For? to find in Berry’s words this definition of “born again”: the practice of a proper love and respect for the creatures of God.[2] 
To be born again in the spirit means to practice a proper love and respect for the creatures of God.
That is what we are for; that is why we are here: to practice a proper love and respect for the creatures of God.
Now one could hear in that something almost a sweet and light as God so love the world that God sent Jesus into the world in order to transform it, to make it whole and healthy, in other words, to save it, until we remember that the work of saving the world put Jesus on a cross.
There’s a great deal of money and power tied up in maintaining the profoundly broken status quo – that was true when the status quo was defined by the Roman Empire and it is equally true now that it is defined by the American Empire. Truth be told, there’s a great deal tied up in maintaining the broken status quo of our own lives as any addict knows well, but as most comfortably affluent folks – that is to say, most of us – so urgently and persistently deny.
Again, I’ll turn to Berry’s essay to make this point clear, and in terms that the church – that is to say, us – stand condemned by. Berry writes,
Like any other public institution so organized, the organized church is dependent on “the economy”; it cannot survive apart from those economic practices that its truth forbids and that its vocation is to correct. If it comes to a choice between the extermination of the fowls of the air and the lilies of the field and the extermination of the building fund, the organized church will elect – indeed, has already elected – to save the building fund. The irony is compounded and made harder to bear by the fact that the building fund can be preserved by crude applications of money, but the fowls of the air and the lilies of the field can be preserved only by true religion, by the practice of a proper love and respect for them as the creatures of God.[3]
This does not mean that we ignore our responsibilities to steward the resources we have been given. We take care of our homes and improve them, just as we do our community’s space. But we do this appropriately when we do so as part of the practice of proper love and respect for the creatures of God.
That must be the chief measure of our various economies – remembering, crucially, that economy – in its Greek roots – means the ordering of the household. In other words, we order our households in order to practice the proper love and respect for the creatures of God. We make home improvements to improve our practices of love and respect, and we do so in community because the community is so much better at holding us accountable than we are by ourselves.
Imagine, if you will, convening a prayerful discernment group before taking out a six-figure home-improvement loan – not a group to help determine if you can afford it, but a group to bring me to a deeper understanding of the motivations behind the expenditure, knowing that money spent in one place is unavailable to be spent in a different one and understanding that my chief purpose, my reason for being here, is to practice the love and respect for the creatures of God.
If I am in the world to change the world, if I am in the world to participate with God in the ongoing project of transforming the world, then the salvation of the world must be part of the calculus in the way I spend my money and the way I spend my time.
If that is not the true meaning of being born again in the Spirit, then the phrase is empty and meaningless and has no hold on me. If, however, such being born again … and again … and again does entail such practices of love then it means everything, and it answers the only question that ever really matters: why are we here? To save the world by loving it as God’s own. Amen.




[1] Wendell Berry, What Are People For? (New York: North Point Press, 1990) 10.
[2] Ibid. 96.
[3] Ibid.